HELP ME SUE WIKIPEDIA

www.barrychamish.com

SAVING DEMOCRATIC JOURNALISM - HELP ME SUE WIKIPEDIA
by Barry Chamish

The common consensus is that Wikipedia is "democratic journalism." Anyone can edit and update their "articles." My webmaster, Steven, tried to edit my "portrait" with his own corrections. He reported, "You're being blocked. No one can touch it." This is what he tried to submit as a balanced report:

BARRY CHAMISH

Born - Winnipeg, Canada Jan. 13/52
Education - BA University of Manitoba, MA Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Military - Served in the regular Israel Defence Forces I979-81, saw active combat in the Lebanon War of 1982.
Family - Two children, Ariel and Sally, born in '91 and '92.

Early writing career- Chamish had four fiction books published in Canada between 1972-76; The Devil Wore An Angel's Suit; Keep Stillman-A Pun; Mack; and Alice In Newfoundland.
Mack earned him a Canada Council Award, while Alice In Newfoundland won him a Manitoba Arts Council Award in 1976, when he had already moved to Israel. These books showed Chamish's unique comedic force in works noted for their stories of deeply felt frustration.

Middle career - Chamish viewed his likelihood of a successful writing career in Canada as dim. Zionist feelings arose during the Yom Kippur War of October, 1973 and he chose to move to Israel. In 1975, he entered the MA program at Hebrew University, while honing his writing in small press magazines in the UK and US. After his army service ended in '81, he embarked on a long period of commercial writing, writing for Jewish outlets, as well as trade magazines. He served as Israeli correspondent for numerous publications including Billboard,
The Hollywood Reporter, Television Business International, while succeeding in cracking mainstream publications such as Long Island Newsday, The New Republic, and Reason.
Chamish became the five time Israeli Scrabble champion which led to this period's triumph, a featured article in The Atlantic in 1987 entertainingly detailing the subtleties of the game. The article is credited by many involved in the game for greatly increasing sophisticated understanding of Scrabble.

Current career - Chamish's writing took a shocking turn in his 1992 book, The Fall Of Israel. (Canongate Books, Edinburgh, Scotland). Chamish continued his gift of making frustration entertaining as he detailed the deep financial and political corruption of Israel. The book changed Chamish's career. It was reviewed throughout the British media, in fact The Economist gave it its lead review, and Chamish appeared on the Israeli national media beginning with the country's most popular show, Dan Shilon Live. However, he topped the attention dramatically in 1997, when his lecture about the Rabin assassination at Hebrew University was sabotaged by Israel's Secret Service (Shabak) with a highly publicized riot against his work. Chamish handled a hostile media cleverly and he made allies within it. When his book Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin was published a year later in Hebrew, it rose to the top of the Israeli bestseller lists. The success was greatly aided by Knesset Member Ophir Pines Paz banning the book's sale at Israeli bookstores. The book is considered a classic in "conspiracy" literature as Chamish proves how Rabin was really murdered, and by whom, with a skilled gathering of evidence and a lawyer's gift of persuasion. Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin was soon translated to seven languages and succeeded by all polls, ie Maariv 2000, to have persuaded over half of religious Israelis and a third of secular that he was right and the government was lying about the assassination.

UFOs and Rabin - Always looking for a marketing niche, Chamish investigated the huge Israeli UFO wave of 1987-99. Using the same skills that made the Rabin book believable, or at least controversial in intelligent circles, Chamish gathered corroborating testimonies, physical evidence, photos and videotapes to create a most intriguing book called Return Of The Giants. His work became the basis of five episodes of the popular American program Sightings, while Fox TV broadcast a half hour of Chamish's work prime time. He now had two separate audiences who wanted to hear him in person, Jewish/Christian for Rabin, and New Age/unaffiliated for Giants. Chamish refused to give his Giants lecture in Israel, believing it would interfere with his Rabin study. Nonetheless, he was invited to present his Rabin lecture in Hebrew over 300 times in Israel, while the Rabin/Giants combination sent him lecturing worldwide, including in Australia, Hong Kong, Brazil, Mexico, England and Italy.

Today - Hurt that the coverup of Rabin's murder was more powerful than his obvious evidence, Chamish went looking for the reason Israel was run by a most unpleasant oligarchy. He has published numerous political books since 2000 including Save Israel; Israel Betrayed; Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism And The Holocaust; The Last Days Of Israel; Bye Bye Gaza; and THE conPROMISED LAND. All are available by going to www.lulu.com and typing "chamish" in the search box. Though all the books are strong, the triumphant book is widely considered Shabtai Tzvi. Within is an expose of the atomic experiments of the '50s using Sephardic children as the guinea pigs. Again, as in all of Chamish's work, the proof is inarguable.

Chamish today resides in Florida. He can be reached at chamishba@gmail.com His website is www.barrychamish.com

Steven is far from the only researcher who tried to update Wikipedia's slander. When the slander first appeared over 5 years ago, numerous correspondents reported that they added editions which were published, then within a day, all were deleted. I beseech my readers, try to edit my Wikipedia report. When you fail, report back to me. Your reports will be part of a legal suit against Wikipedia for slander.
What is slander? Simply, you try to prove your argument by using any reference that supports it, and only using material, often from allies, that does so. You can prove anything using this method. But in the journalism of the past, you would be quickly found out, and ideally, sued for slander. This is what Wikipedia did with me, and I'm positive, I'm not alone. In my case, their report insists that it used the Jerusalem Post for guidance. In fact, there were numerous reports in The Post that supported me, but all were ignored. Thus, it appears, that The Post supported the article.
Same with references. The article relies on the view of Daniel Pipes, of the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR). On a recent radio show, my host Dr. Stanley Monteith, congratulated me for being so significant that, "CFR prince of darkness, Daniel Pipes, found you important enough to try to bring you down." The problem is that some Jews believe he is pro-Israel and anti-Arab, thus an ally. In fact, as Dr. Monteith noted, he is nothing of the sort. He plays a role to fool the public and suppress any opposition using any slander he chooses without fear of repercussions. These are the rewards of toiling for the "establishment."
But if there is justice left in America, we can successfully sue Wikipedia. The roadblock, as usual, is legal costs. They can pay to keep any suit in court forever. Only someone with deep pockets can ever beat them in court.
First, read the actual Wikipedia report. A correspondent was furious when he perused it:

"I think most truthseekers would agree that although Wikipedia is relatively accurate on mainstream topics, when it comes to sensitive geopolitical issues and those who report on them, Wikipedia isn't to be trusted. However, for them to label you a "Holocaust denier" [sic] is a low blow even by their standards. I don't blame you at all for being upset. Although I don't know any lawyers willing or able to work pro bono (my brother's a lawyer, but I don't think he's in a position to take on any pro bono work), I certainly hope you can make those Wikipedia liars retract their garbage! You served in the IDF, distribute Rabbi Cywiak's memoir, and they try to slime you with this crap? Pathetic! Hang in there my friend; if anything, Wikipedia's response to your work shows that you're on the right track. (Not that their trespass should go unchallenged!)"

You heard him right. Wikipedia calls me a Holocaust denier. My readers know the exact opposite is the truth. Yet untold thousands have read the lie. Read the actual report and I'll trust you not to believe a word:

WIKIPEDIA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Chamish

The chief critic of Barry Chamish is Little Stevie Pluat in the Jewish Press weekly[19] and the Jerusalem Post daily.[20] Daniel Pipes has also dismissed Chamish's work as "nonsense".
The Americans for a Safe Israel newsletter described Chamish thus: -
Chamish literally spouts conspiracy theories. Does the Israeli government claim that Tourism Minister Rehavam Zeevi was murdered by Arab terrorists? Chamish knows better. Prior to his death, writes Chamish, "Zeevi went on the war path against Peres, which was not a wise strategy. Others have tried and others have died." Chamish hints darkly at connections between Peres and the French and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. He writes: "It would have been no trouble for Peres and the French to order the PFLP to knock off Zeevi. (There's unconscious humor for you. Chamish? Proof? A ramble down free association lane is Chamish's notion of "proof.") Chamish promises that the "answer, ultimately will lead to the same organization which murdered Yitzhak Rabin." (Peres, needless to say, was behind that one too.)[21]

Barry Chamish (born 1952 in Winnipeg) is a Canadian-Israeli writer, investigative journalist and public speaker, best known as a conspiracy theorist and UFO investigator. He is also widely considered to be a Holocaust Denier because he publishes hundreds of his pieces on Holocaust Denier web sites. He has spoken before numerous conferences of Holocaust Deniers and is a columnist for the Holocaust Denial rense.com web site.

He studied at the University of Manitoba and later moved to Israel. In 1975 he attended the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, receiving an MA in 1979. In 1981, Chamish founded a small press service and has contributed investigative reports to publications as diverse as National Review, Israel Business Today and New Internationalist.
Chamish has written several books, most self-published, of which the best-known is Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin?, published in 1998. In this book, Chamish blames the Rabin assassination on Shimon Peres, at that time Israel's minister of Foreign Affairs, and on the Shin Bet instead of the convicted assassin Yigal Amir.
Chamish has also been a Scrabble champion in Israel and has written on the game for The Atlantic Monthly.[1]
Contents [hide]
1 Views
1.1 Ariel Sharon
1.2 Shimon Peres
1.3 Gaza Strip withdrawal and Hurricane Katrina
1.4 UFOs
1.5 Miscellaneous theories
2 Criticism
3 See also
4 References
5 Bibliography
6 External links
6.1 Websites and web-based articles
7 Trivia
7.1 Journal and press articles

[edit]Views
[edit]Ariel Sharon
He has stated that Sharon, in collusion with Peres and Henry Kissinger, deliberately perpetrated the Sabra and Shatila massacre in order to destroy Begin's political reputation and career.[2] Chamish maintains a very low opinion of Sharon based on a number episodes in Sharon's public life.[3]
Chamish also described the drowning of former Israeli minister Rafael Eitan, who reportedly was "swept away by a wave while working on a dock in Ashdod", as a "hit" by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.[4] The police and media in Israel saw it as an accident.
[edit]Shimon Peres
Chamish claims that Yigal Amir did not shoot Rabin. Members of Yigal Amir's family told Yedioth Ahronoth in January 2005 that "they object to Chamish's ideas, and that [Barry Chamish and David Cohen] have no right to publish such a website. They added the campaign angers Yigal Amir himself."[5]
Chamish has also accused Peres of the death of former Utah Congressman D. Wayne Owens the founder of the Center for Middle East Peace and Economic Cooperation and head of the Middle East Peace Center because "he raised congressional concern about Palestinian-sponsored terrorism...[to] the ire of some Israeli [peace] activists" and because Owens uncovered supposedly fraud he had put himself at risk:
Barely a fortnight before, Rep. Owens learned the Ginosar scandal broke in Israel. He was either terrified or furious. It's a tossup. If he was terrified, it was because it wouldn't be long before his direct ties to Stephen Cohen would implicate him deeply in the scandals. If he was furious, it was because he finally learned how badly he had been scammed by Peres, Abraham, Masri and Cohen. Either way, he threatened to blow the whistle on the Peres Peace Center. He was poisoned at dinner and dead on a beach by 9 PM. Rep. Owens is now another notch on Peres' gunbelt.[6]
In his explanation for the "Sharon stroke mystery", Chamish explains that this was a murder attempt by Shimon Peres and Yoram Rubin. While he gives no explanation why Peres and a bodyguard would want to kill the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, let alone any evidence, Chamish tells us that before he fell into a coma, Sharon wanted to appoint the Israeli president Moshe Katzav as his deputy and not his close political affiliate Ehud Olmert. Also he explains that Sharon was about to allow business people to build a casino in the dismantled Gush Katif settlement block.[7] Typically no evidence is provided for such murder theories, apart from sometimes loose associations between individuals.
Chamish also claims that Shimon Peres gave away Jerusalem to the Vatican in a secret clause of the Oslo Agreements and that this fact had been widely published in Israel.[8] Chamish claims that all Israeli politicians are secret followers of Shabbtai Zvi, a man whose movement of followers disappeared entirely 300 years ago.
See also: Yitzhak Rabin assassination conspiracy theories
[edit]Gaza Strip withdrawal and Hurricane Katrina
Barry Chamish connects the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip with the Hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans, because Gush (Katif) and Gulf start with GU and Katrina and (Gush) Katif start with KAT. He points out that the remainder of the latter words, after subtracting KAT and rearranging rina, is "if rain". Chamish told Aaron Klein, the Jerusalem reporter of the World Net Daily: Simple human beings cannot fully understand what is going on, but the events certainly must be connected. It's statistically impossible to have two such great natural disasters like the recent tsunami in Asia and Katrina right after each other. This is the hand of God. He is saying something.[9] This view is also supported by some religious Jews who are not conspiracy theorists.[10]
In addition to the letters, Chamish connects the two occurrences also with numbers: "There are approximately 6 million people in Israel. 10,000 divided by 6,000,000 equals 0.00167. Two weeks later, Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in the southern United States, and laid waste and complete desolation to the City of New Orleans. New Orleans has a population of 500,000. US News agencies are openly calling those displaced by the hurricane 'refugees.' There are approximately 300 million people in the United States. 500,000 divided by 300,000,000 equals 0.00167."[11]
[edit]UFOs
Chamish has also written a book about UFO sightings in Israel. He continues to write often about UFOs, although he still claims his analysis on UFOs to be true.[12]
[edit]Miscellaneous theories
In the Versailles banquet hall disaster, where a floor collapsed during a wedding, 23 persons were killed and 300 more injured. Chamish deducts that this was a sort of general rehearsal for the American set-up of the 9/11 attacks on the United States, in which almost 3000 persons died.[13][14]
In 2005, Chamish broke the story of a large secret military base being built in Israel by the US and published numerous pictures as well.[15][16] Located nearRosh Ha'Ayin, the base was completed shortly thereafter and turned over to the IDF.
Chamish also accuses Natan Sharansky of being a "liar",[17] who hid his alleged role of KGB double-agent,[18] and not a heroic refusenik as many believe.
[edit]Criticism

Did you notice the last sentence? People tried to edit this libel but not one, not even one, edition was published? Wikipedia chose not to balance this outrage and we ask why. Our guess is that Wikipedia is not what they claim to be and they present "facts", to be kind, with bias.
Will anyone try to stop this attack on basic freedom of speech? I seek an attorney who will challenge this so-called bastion of free thinking head on. We've got Wikipedia by their tender parts by calling me a Holocaust denier and refusing to delete, edit or offer counter arguments, though many have tried. This is years of career-affecting slander. Wikipedia is a multi-billion dollar operation and I need a brave attorney to fight them Pro Bono. Even Pro Bono, I'll have to pay filing, travel, and untold expenses. Who will be my partner in attacking Wikipedia for the good of true Free Speech? Who will join my legal team, professional or civilian?

end

Without contributions, this work of mine would come to a crashing halt. Off the top of my head, the following have made significant contributions:
Baruch, Tova, Steven, Marc, Aliza, Ron, Karen, Bernard, Herman, Ari, Cindy, Jim, Marilyn, Peter, Christie, David, Lynn, Fred, Howard, Michael, Brenda and more. Thanks to them I manage to squeeze by...barely. Some months it's close right to the last day of the month. I appreciate and remember each contributor. Without you, there wouldn't be me.

Barry Chamish
POB 840157
Saint Augustine, FL 32080 USA

Paypal: chamishba@gmail.com

I have a radio show with a good listening audience. If you have something newsworthy to tell the world, contact me and I'll bend over backwards to put you on the air.

Listen to my radio show:
http://wwfar.com/mp3s/BarryChamish/

BE SURE TO LISTEN TO BARRY CHAMISH
Live TUESDAYS at 3PM PT / 6PM ET ON:
www.FirstAmendmentRadio.com

My new book, THE conPROMISED LAND can be ordered direct from the publisher http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback_book/the_conpromised_land/6398777

The elite won in Tunisia and Egypt

The elite won in Tunisia and Egypt

Data: 20/02/11 14:45

Nascondi

Nothing really changed, only masspeople died.

In Tunisia something happened that nobody had foreseen.

Why did it happen and can we do it again elsewhere?

But we have to do it better. You can’t make a revolution by demonstrating on squares, you have to attack and remove all people with power (and money) who rule the country.

Hundreds of masspeople died, thousands were wounded and many were arrested – and I have not heard of any compensation.

Some very greedy elitepersons were thrown out – with enough money to be rich forever.
The new elite can rule without opposition and become as corrupt, rich and greedy as the ousted ones – or do you think The People can stage another round of demonstrations.

The People got some hope and they will return home and work even harder – for the benefit of the new elite.

It is sad, as sad as in Egypt or Yemen.

For real change you must attack the centre of power that is in the hands of a small group of people with money and power.

The Tunisian actions belonged to the Old Culture of Protest that asks and not to the New Culture of Resistance that forces.

Of course I welcome that the Tunisian masses became active but must we enjoy that the only result is that a new greedy group replaces the old one?

The new leading group was already powerful because they could order the police to stop shooting people. In the past these people supported the cruel president and don’t believe they suddenly became decent. Do not think that the industrialists who filled their pocket at the cost of the living conditions of common citizens will change their old habits.

The Egyptian military intervened “to safeguard the country” and some demonstrators approved. But they safeguarded their own position. The ultimate goal of power is earning money, now and in the future. The elite decided that the continuing presence of some presidents (in Tunisia and in Egypt) was contrary to their interests. The spontaneous uprising was used to remove the too greedy presidents from their high positions, the rest could continue to be greedy.

New weapons to prevent that any elite uses the country for its own benefit were not developed. Leaders were asked to behave decently, they were not forced to become human. By using outdated and insufficient actions a more humane world never can be reached.

The People must realise that it always turns around power, money and the people who have power and money. When the centre of power is not attacked any new leader will again enrich the own group because there is no opposition. Everywhere people are ruled by greedy and cruel leaders. And it takes many years before dissatisfaction becomes so huge that a single event can trigger an avalanche and The People rise up again.

Still it is interesting what happened in Tunisia. The People looked subdued, looked to accept the oppressing inhuman system. But a small deed caused chaos as has already been described by the Theory of Chaos. The flapping of the wings of a butterfly over Brazil can cause a hurricane over Cuba. But not all butterflies cause a typhoon. The copycat method of burning yourself in the hope change occurs did not work in other countries.

The Theory of Catastrophes teaches that a jump in human development can occur when The People become active. By using old methods of protest, asking for a change, fighting with the police etc. change will hardly occur. In Tunisia part of the elite could usurp power by agreeing that the top elite had to be ousted. In Egypt the military remained powerful and only removed some people at the very top. The People did not have the energy and the right idea to remove any greedy, cruel and selfish elite.
The two Theories can be used to get better results.

The right tactics were not used. There was a short period of chaos and thus the possibility something really new could be born. Then the police reinstalled order. Who ordered them to act and what kind of order they bring about? Of course not an order from which a New Humane Society can arise. Some new greedy leaders came out of the shadow to establish an order that resembles very much the old order.

This new group of greedy leaders benefits most. Remove anyone who is not right and honest. Only then you get real change.

Without the clear goal to undermine the (money) power of the greedy rich, we remain in the Old Culture of Protest.

Down with Any Elite

Friendly greetings, Joost van Steenis

downwithelite@gmail.com

For background information see “Down with any Elite” http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis or read my books.
My latest book FROM CHAOS TO CHANGE can be downloaded for free from http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis/chaoschange.pdf.
You get a SIGNED PAPERBACK by sending 10 euro by paypal to
You receive once or twice a month new articles by sending an empty email with the subject subscribe to downwithelite@gmail.com

SHAPESHIFTING INTO HIGHER CONSCIOUSNESS

EXCERPT FROM CHAPTER ONE -
SHAPESHIFTING INTO HIGHER CONSCIOUSNESS
(Llyn Roberts, O-Books 2011)

The Tibetan Buddhist term, Bardo, literally means “between two shores.” Bardo is commonly known as the period following death after consciousness leaves the body. Bardo is the transition from death to re-birth. Yet, it also describes the gap between moments or events; the intermediary period as something changes from one form to another. One experience, or reality, has died or ended. The next moment, or event, has not yet come into being. Bardo is a rich interlude. It is a realm of potential where we can cleanse the old and create anew. Our ability to do so is shaped by past momentum, future longing, and our ability to be present. In this gap, awareness can magnetize or repel; we can draw to us or push away from any number of possible outcomes.

Imagine leaving familiar lands to cross an ocean expanse, like early explorers. You are between two shores. You have abandoned what is recognizable, you navigate into the unknown. The journey may feel perilous, one that you are not sure you will survive. You pass many lands along the way. One scenario has you grasping at the first solid piece of land you come upon. You are driven by the grief of what is lost, the terror of dying, and the uncertainty of what is to come. The gap, the journey, is unbearable. Another scenario finds you passing by alluring lands yet that do not resonate. You trust and employ your heart and senses. You intuit the right direction and navigate beyond fear and seduction.

Prophecies from original peoples the world over tell us that the world is changing. The world is not ending, but the world as we know it is ending. How we experience, interpret, and respond to what is happening can make all the difference.

__________________________________________________________

Visit us anytime on the web at www.dreamchange.org.