venerdì 22 giugno 2018
giovedì 17 maggio 2018
Brandon Smith: Global Elitists Are Not Human
Brandon Smith: Global Elitists Are Not Human
Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,
It is often said that “other-izing” people overall can be dangerous and other-izing your enemies specifically can be tactically detrimental. For one, it can lead to a false sense of superiority over those people as you assert some kind of imagined genetic advantage. It can also lead to dangerous generalizations of vast groups as you categorize and pigeonhole millions as being exactly the same when this is rationally impossible. However, other-izing is perhaps the only option when faced with a very particular type of person embracing a very particular brand of ideology; other-izing can become a matter of survival.
I am of course talking about globalists.

I am talking about the people that influence or outright control government policy as they stand over the shoulders of supposedly freely elected officials. I am talking about the people that influence economic security or insecurity through unaccountable central banking conglomerates. I am talking about the men and women that desire to dictate the fate of billions.
These people are not easily identified by anything other than their rhetoric and actions. They are made up of multiple ethnic groups. They herald from all corners of the planet. They do not subscribe to any one spiritual doctrine, but they do publicly devote themselves to many different religions as a means to “fit in” with the common citizen. Globalism IS their religion. And their god? Well, they see themselves as gods.
To be a globalist, though, one has to do more than merely subscribe to the tenets of globalism; there is a matter of character traits and actions which must be examined.
After studying the behavior of globalists and their organizations for quite some time, I have noticed that their psychological patterns tend to match with a narrow band of people that are best described as “criminally insane.” More accurately, globalists behave like high-functioning narcissistic sociopaths and psychopaths. But what are the traits of such people? Let’s take a look at some of them…
False Sense Of Superiority – Self-Aggrandizement
Every person wants to be seen as important or unique. But, narcissistic sociopaths believe themselves to be entitled to special treatment and see themselves as above the laws and niceties of normal society. They sometimes seek to prop up this attitude through “accomplishment;” scratching for positions of power and influence in order to reinforce the notion that they are special compared to others.Of course, power is usually an artificial construct because the only power we have over others is the power they give us, knowingly or unknowingly. Power does not make one special. The narcissistic sociopath does not make such distinctions, however. He/she only distinguishes between the people who strive for dominance and everyone else. In their minds, people that covet power are a superior subspecies, while people who do not covet power are considered bugs.
Frankly, I see no reason why we should not make the same absolute statement, only in reverse.
Narcissistic sociopaths and psychopaths are stricken with visions of assumed greatness. They do not view the content of their accomplishments as necessarily important. Meaning, they think they were born great, therefore, it is not for them to accomplish anything that serves to help others or advance the knowledge of humanity. They don’t care about proving their greatness through legitimate achievement, they only care that people BELIEVE they are special, that they are anointed.
Manipulation And Coercion
A narcissistic sociopath usually prefers to get what they want easily. They expect people to hand them adoration and control automatically. But if they don’t get what they want as a matter of course, they will use any means at their disposal.This usually includes the threat of force or the use of force, the use of torture, the use of elaborate lies and schemes to push their target into a corner (to make them behave in a specific manner), the use of psychological conditioning (molding behavior, usually through fear responses) and also the use of “gaslighting” (accusing the target of being “crazy” if they do not subscribe to the narcissist’s twisted view of the world).
Of course, this kind of disturbed person is never actually satisfied,
even when they do get what they want. They always want more, there is
always something else they need to fill the endless void within.
Lack Of Empathy For Others
Not all narcissists are sociopaths, but most sociopaths are narcissists. When we speak of narcissists, it is important to remember that there are varying degrees of this psychological cancer. When I mention globalists in particular as being “narcissistic,” I am referring to their propensity to be high functioning narcissists with sociopathic tendencies. In other words, they are narcissists that not only have an inflated sense of self worth, but they are also devoid of empathy and conscience. They are willing to harm others to any degree to get what they want in the moment as long as they think can avoid consequences for doing so.There is also the matter of distinction between sociopaths and psychopaths. This is a little hard to describe being that they are so similar in many respects. I would put it this way — while sociopaths chase a goal and are willing to step on people to get to it, psychopaths step on people even when they don’t have a goal in mind. That is to say, the psychopath enjoys the act of destruction; what they want most of all is other people's pain.
Sociopaths and psychopaths both appear to permeate the ranks of globalist institutions. Some of them want to build an idol to themselves and don’t care who they harm in the process. Some of them derive great enjoyment from simply hurting as many people as possible.
Desperate Need For Adoration
It is not enough for the narcissistic sociopath to attain a level of respect through coercion. Ultimately, what they want is for the lowly masses to voluntarily ACCEPT their greatness as absolute, as an obvious and undeniable fact of life. What they want is reverence and devotion. As mentioned earlier, they want to be treated as gods by the people around them, and if they are particularly ambitious, by everyone in the world.This is a strange dynamic indeed, for it requires a highly elaborate set of schemes and manipulations. If one is not a great person, let alone god-like, the amount of psychological conditioning needed to convince people otherwise is substantial. This makes the narcissistic sociopath a potential slave to his/her own incessantly engineered conspiracies; lies pile upon lies and schemes upon schemes in the search for something they will never truly achieve.
Globalists Are Psychologically Broken Non-Humans
In the world of alternative analysis and investigative journalism it is not uncommon to run into people who attribute an otherworldly status to globalists. Some people see them as a representation of biblical Apocalypse — minions from the depths of hell. Others see them as literally alien — interdimensional beings posing as human. And while many will laugh at such people as fringe conspiracy freaks, I think it is important to understand why they see the globalists this way.When faced with true and organized evil empty of all care or remorse, one may be tempted to apply supernatural explanations. I'm not sure that I am against the idea.
Globalists exhibit most if not all the telltale signs of narcissistic sociopaths, including being devoid of conscience and moral compass. While there are many definitions of what it is that makes us human, there is a kind of universal requirement regardless of culture; namely the requirement of something like a soul.
What makes a soul? How about a basic desire to do right by others even if that means not getting what we want all the time? This is a good starting point, but there is more to it than that.
Psychologists and scientists have over many decades found a pattern of inherent character traits hardwired in the human psyche, traits present in humans from the moment of birth that stand outside of the influences of social environment. Carl Jung was the foremost expert in this field of “archetypal qualities,” with a vast catalog of case studies from around the world including studies in tribal Africa. An important part of archetypal or inborn knowledge and traits is the notion of good and evil; we are born understanding that certain behaviors are constructive while others are destructive and abhorrent. This is most likely the source of what we call “conscience.”
Unfortunately, not all people are born with a conscience. In some people, the difference between good and evil or constructive and destructive behavior is treated as blurry or frivolous. Jung and other psychologists mark this subset of our species as “latent” sociopaths and psychopaths. Together they make up around 10% of any given culture or group. Many of them remain “latent” and more or less harmless for their entire lives unless certain unstable environmental conditions provide fuel for their malfunction. Around 1% are born as full blown sociopaths and psychopaths. These are what I would call the “non-humans.”
This is because high level narcissism and sociopathy are not traditional “mental illnesses,” but ingrained character traits. A narcissistic sociopath cannot be “cured” of his ailment because it is not an ailment, it is who they are. If you were to take the narcissism and sociopathy away from them, there would be nothing left to their personality.
When a normal person comes in contact with someone that has no inherent conscience there is an immediate recoil; a sense that they have just stumbled across a monster. This is not an exaggeration, this is entirely accurate.
High level narcissists and sociopaths are physically human of course, but if we were to peer in at a visual representation of their psyche, we would find a barren wasteland — a place where ghouls lurk. They do not dream as normal people dream. They do not feel joy in the manner normal people do. They do not feel fulfillment in the things that commonly lift up the rest of us. They are incapable of love for others. They are incapable of regret for their actions, and only ever feel regret over failing to get what they want. They do not see other people as individuals, they see them as tools to be exploited.
Being sociopathic though does not mean that they are ignorant of what makes the rest of us function. On the contrary, sociopaths are very good at identifying the personal desires and drives of others, and mimicking people in a way that makes them seem “human.” They are parasites by nature,and thus they have to be able to get close to their host victims if they are to survive.
The globalist dynamic is interesting in that it is an example of organized narcissistic sociopathy. Globalists have stood at the forefront of numerous wars, economic collapses and tyrannies over the years, all ending in great suffering for the masses. Contrary to popular belief, sociopaths and psychopaths DO work together towards a common goal as long as there is a sense of mutual benefit. In fact, these people seem to gravitate to each other in odd ways. It is my belief that globalist hierarchies actually seek out people with narcissistic and sociopathic personalities; that they do this deliberately when they wish to expand their ranks. These seem to be the only aspects that they all have in common.
It is quite a 'conspiracy theory', I know. But look at it this way, how else can we explain their tendencies and behaviors? If organized annihilation was an intrinsic value of humanity then we would have died out long ago. The globalists are not human, though. They are something opposite, and if you do not understand this core truth, they can be bewildering and terrifying.
lunedì 25 dicembre 2017
How to organize the resistance
Resistance
(from: U.S. Army Guerrilla Warfare Handbook, Department of the Army, 2009)
a. General. Resistance is the cornerstone of guerrilla warfare. Underground and guerrilla warfare stem from a resistance movement.
b. Definition. Resistance is defined as the act of opposition of one individual or group to another. A resistance movement is the organized element of a disaffected population which resists a government or occupying power with means varying from passive to violently active. Resistance movements begin to form when dissatisfaction occurs among strongly motivated individuals who cannot further their cause by peaceful and legal means.
c. The Nature of Resistance .
1. Resistance, rebellion or civil war begins in a nation where political, sociological, economic or religious division has occurred. Divisions of this nature are usually caused by a violation of rights or privileges, the oppression of one group by the dominant or occupying force, or the threat to the life and freedom of the populace. Resistance also may develop in a nation where the once welcomed liberators have failed to improve an intolerable social or economic situation. Resistance can also be deliberately inspired from external sources against an assumed grievance. Resistance can be active or passive. Passive resistance may be in the form of smoldering resentment which needs only leadership or a means of expression to mature to active resistance.
2. Some people join a resistance movement because of an innate desire to survive. Others may join the resistance forces because of deep ideological convictions. But all, regardless of initial motivation, are bound together to fight against a common enemy. Part of the population assists the resistance movement as fighters in the guerrilla force; some assist as part-time guerrillas or in civilian support agencies know as auxiliary units; while others are members of the underground.d. Influencing Factors .
1. Environment.
( a ) Terrain. The physical location of the resistance movement has a great influence upon its organization and tactics. Because they provide suitable areas for the security of operations, mountains, swamps, large forests or jungles nurture overt or guerrilla type resistance. Flat plains areas and large towns or cities are more apt to lead to underground resistance activities although the possibility of organizing a guerrilla force in these areas should not be overlooked.
( b ) Cultural. A peoples’ cultural environment also has its effects on resistance movements. The urge to bear arms, escape, and fight the enemy is dependent on the cultural background of the people. Men from rural or peasant environment, not subjected to tight governmental control, have more opportunity to show their hatred of the enemy occupation by overt and violent means such as guerrilla warfare. People from an industrialized and highly urbanized culture will resist with such activities as sabotage, propaganda, passive acts and espionage.
( c ) Control of population . When an occupying power is able to exercise close and stringent control over the population, the resistance movement is conducted primarily in secrecy. When the police and military forces of the occupying power are diverted or otherwise ineffectual, the resistance movement may be conducted with primarily overt guerrilla actions.
2. Motivation . Besides the geographical and cultural environment influencing guerrilla warfare, the sociological climate produces many motivating factors which have a profound effect upon the resistance movement. Strong individual motivation is essential to the formation of a resistance force. Although some individual motives are not ideal and, if openly expressed, may do harm to the guerrilla effort, the following are examples of what some of the true motives may be.
( a ) Ideology. In guerrilla units some individuals have developed strong ideological motives for taking up arms. These ideologies take root in two broad areas—politics and religion. The individual tends to subordinate his own personality to these ideologies and works constantly and solely for the “cause.” In some resistance fighters, this motive is extremely strong.
( b ) Economic. Many individuals join resistance movements to keep from starving or to keep from losing their livelihood. An organized resistance force may exert economic influence on individuals who fail to support their movement.
( c ) Personal gain . Personal gain is the motivating force of some volunteers. An individual, so motivated, may change sides if he believes he can gain more by fighting for the opposing force.
( d ) Hate. People who have lost loved ones due to enemy actions may fight against that enemy as a result of engendered hatred. Uncontrolled hatred can pose problems for the sponsor because it is difficult to curb the fanaticism of such individuals and properly direct their efforts.
( e ) Security . If the resistance movement is strong or gives the impression of being powerful, many individuals join out of a feeling of personal safety. Usually, this situation occurs only after the resistance movement is well organized and the enemy has been weakened by other actions. Others join in order to escape recruitment into the service of the enemy.
( f ) Ego. Personal motives such as power, pride, and adventure operate to some extent in all individuals. Depending upon the moral fibre of the individual, these motives may sustain him in times of great stress.
( g ) Fear . Some individuals become a part of the resistance movement through no personal desire of their own. They join the movement out of fear of reprisals against themselves or their families.
3. Chance for success . In addition to motivation and circumstances of environment, a population must feel that there is ultimately a chance for success or there can be no effective resistance movement developed. Active participation in any resistance movement is influenced by its chance for success.
4. Guidance . Resistance movements stand or fall on the caliber of the leaders and other individuals in the organization. An understanding of the environmental and individual motivating factors will assist greatly those who desire to obtain the optimum from a guerrilla organization. An analysis of these factors plays an important part in evaluating potential resistance forces.
(from: U.S. Army Guerrilla Warfare Handbook, Department of the Army, 2009)
a. General. Resistance is the cornerstone of guerrilla warfare. Underground and guerrilla warfare stem from a resistance movement.
b. Definition. Resistance is defined as the act of opposition of one individual or group to another. A resistance movement is the organized element of a disaffected population which resists a government or occupying power with means varying from passive to violently active. Resistance movements begin to form when dissatisfaction occurs among strongly motivated individuals who cannot further their cause by peaceful and legal means.
c. The Nature of Resistance .
1. Resistance, rebellion or civil war begins in a nation where political, sociological, economic or religious division has occurred. Divisions of this nature are usually caused by a violation of rights or privileges, the oppression of one group by the dominant or occupying force, or the threat to the life and freedom of the populace. Resistance also may develop in a nation where the once welcomed liberators have failed to improve an intolerable social or economic situation. Resistance can also be deliberately inspired from external sources against an assumed grievance. Resistance can be active or passive. Passive resistance may be in the form of smoldering resentment which needs only leadership or a means of expression to mature to active resistance.
2. Some people join a resistance movement because of an innate desire to survive. Others may join the resistance forces because of deep ideological convictions. But all, regardless of initial motivation, are bound together to fight against a common enemy. Part of the population assists the resistance movement as fighters in the guerrilla force; some assist as part-time guerrillas or in civilian support agencies know as auxiliary units; while others are members of the underground.d. Influencing Factors .
1. Environment.
( a ) Terrain. The physical location of the resistance movement has a great influence upon its organization and tactics. Because they provide suitable areas for the security of operations, mountains, swamps, large forests or jungles nurture overt or guerrilla type resistance. Flat plains areas and large towns or cities are more apt to lead to underground resistance activities although the possibility of organizing a guerrilla force in these areas should not be overlooked.
( b ) Cultural. A peoples’ cultural environment also has its effects on resistance movements. The urge to bear arms, escape, and fight the enemy is dependent on the cultural background of the people. Men from rural or peasant environment, not subjected to tight governmental control, have more opportunity to show their hatred of the enemy occupation by overt and violent means such as guerrilla warfare. People from an industrialized and highly urbanized culture will resist with such activities as sabotage, propaganda, passive acts and espionage.
( c ) Control of population . When an occupying power is able to exercise close and stringent control over the population, the resistance movement is conducted primarily in secrecy. When the police and military forces of the occupying power are diverted or otherwise ineffectual, the resistance movement may be conducted with primarily overt guerrilla actions.
2. Motivation . Besides the geographical and cultural environment influencing guerrilla warfare, the sociological climate produces many motivating factors which have a profound effect upon the resistance movement. Strong individual motivation is essential to the formation of a resistance force. Although some individual motives are not ideal and, if openly expressed, may do harm to the guerrilla effort, the following are examples of what some of the true motives may be.
( a ) Ideology. In guerrilla units some individuals have developed strong ideological motives for taking up arms. These ideologies take root in two broad areas—politics and religion. The individual tends to subordinate his own personality to these ideologies and works constantly and solely for the “cause.” In some resistance fighters, this motive is extremely strong.
( b ) Economic. Many individuals join resistance movements to keep from starving or to keep from losing their livelihood. An organized resistance force may exert economic influence on individuals who fail to support their movement.
( c ) Personal gain . Personal gain is the motivating force of some volunteers. An individual, so motivated, may change sides if he believes he can gain more by fighting for the opposing force.
( d ) Hate. People who have lost loved ones due to enemy actions may fight against that enemy as a result of engendered hatred. Uncontrolled hatred can pose problems for the sponsor because it is difficult to curb the fanaticism of such individuals and properly direct their efforts.
( e ) Security . If the resistance movement is strong or gives the impression of being powerful, many individuals join out of a feeling of personal safety. Usually, this situation occurs only after the resistance movement is well organized and the enemy has been weakened by other actions. Others join in order to escape recruitment into the service of the enemy.
( f ) Ego. Personal motives such as power, pride, and adventure operate to some extent in all individuals. Depending upon the moral fibre of the individual, these motives may sustain him in times of great stress.
( g ) Fear . Some individuals become a part of the resistance movement through no personal desire of their own. They join the movement out of fear of reprisals against themselves or their families.
3. Chance for success . In addition to motivation and circumstances of environment, a population must feel that there is ultimately a chance for success or there can be no effective resistance movement developed. Active participation in any resistance movement is influenced by its chance for success.
4. Guidance . Resistance movements stand or fall on the caliber of the leaders and other individuals in the organization. An understanding of the environmental and individual motivating factors will assist greatly those who desire to obtain the optimum from a guerrilla organization. An analysis of these factors plays an important part in evaluating potential resistance forces.
giovedì 30 novembre 2017
INTELLIGENCE, DE KERCKHOVE INAUGURERÀ IL MASTER DELL’UNICAL
INTELLIGENCE, DERRICK DE KERCKHOVE INAUGURERÀ IL MASTER IN INTELLIGENCE DELL’UNIVERSITÀ DELLA CALABRIA
RENDE (29.11.2017) - Sarà la lectio magistralis su “Intelligence e Intelligenza artificiale” di Derrick De Kerckhove a inaugurare a Rende sabato 2 dicembre 2017 alle 8.30 presso l’aula “Caldora” la settima edizione del Master in Intelligence dell’Università della Calabria, il primo a essere stato istituito in un ateneo pubblico italiano nel 2007. La manifestazione verrà introdotta dai saluti del Rettore dell’ateneo Gino Mirocle Crisci, del direttore del Dipartimento Lingue e Scienze dell’Educazione Roberto Guarasci, del Direttore del Corso di Laurea in Scienze dell’Educazione Giuseppe Spadafora e dalla relazione del Direttore del Master Mario Caligiuri.
Dopo gli interventi dei componenti il comitato scientifico del Master Alberto Ventura e Luciano Romito e del rappresentante della Scuola del Dipartimento delle informazioni per la sicurezza in rappresentanza del Direttore del DIS Alessandro Pansa, ci sarà la lezione inaugurale di De Kerckhove.
Come ogni anno, ci saranno docenti di prestigio, tra i quali Evgeny Morozov, Nicola Gratteri, Luciano Violante, Giulio Tremonti, oltre al geografo Franco Farinelli, al Direttore della CRUI Alberto De Toni, al Direttore della LUISS Business School Paolo Boccardelli, al Direttore dell’Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Stefano Cingolani, ai direttori delle Agenzie di Intelligence Vittorio Stelo e Nicolò Pollari, al Direttore della Scuola di Formazione del DIS Paolo Scotto di Castelbianco, ai prefetti Carlo Mosca, Marco Valentini e Luigi Varratta, all’ambasciatore Michele Valensise, al Direttore del Centro Studi Americani Paolo Messa, al Direttore di “Limes” Lucio Caracciolo, al Responsabile della Sicurezza dell’ENI Alfio Rapisarda, ai professori Antonio Baldassarre e Antonio Teti, ai generali Carlo Jean e Fabio Mini e a tanti altri. Del Comitato Scientifico fanno parte anche Paolo Boccardelli e Marco Valentini.
Le lezioni di svolgeranno come di consueto nella giornata di sabato fino al 5 maggio 2018 mentre gli esami finali sono previsti per dicembre 2018. Parte delle lezioni si potranno seguire via streaming.
Gli iscritti di questa edizione sono aumentati di un terzo rispetto all’anno scorso, con più di un terzo provenienti da fuori regione. La manifestazione inaugurale verrà seguita da Radio Radicale e si potrà seguire in diretta via streaming alla pagina Facebook Intelligence Lab.
venerdì 25 agosto 2017
SPECIAL OPS, COUNTER-PROPAGANDA, OVERCLASSIFICATION
SECRECY NEWS
From the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2017, Issue No. 60
August 24, 2017 Secrecy News Blog: https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/
SPECIAL OPS, COUNTER-PROPAGANDA, OVERCLASSIFICATION
The House Armed Services Committee took a retrospective look at US special operations forces earlier this year, thirty years after the establishment of US Special Operations Command (SOCOM).
"SOCOM has a lot of missions it is responsible for, and has had several new ones added to it," said Rep. Elise M. Stefanik (R-NY) at a hearing earlier this year. "Are there any of those missions that should go away or be reassigned?"
SOCOM Commander Gen. Raymond A. Thomas was ready with the answer: "There are no missions that should go away or be reassigned."
See Three Decades Later: A Review and Assessment of our Special Operations Forces 30 Years After the Creation of U.S. Special Operations Command, House Armed Services Committee, May 2, 2017.
Some other notable congressional hearing volumes that have recently been published include:
Crafting an Information Warfare and Counter-propaganda Strategy for the Emerging Security Environment, House Armed Services Committee, March 15, 2017
Examining the Costs of Overclassification on Transparency and Security, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, December 7, 2016
sabato 12 agosto 2017
DPRKorea: Chongryon Supports Statement of DPRK Government
Chongryon Supports Statement of DPRK Government
http://www.kcna.kp/kcna.user.article.retrieveNewsViewInfoList.kcmsf#this
Tokyo,
August 10 (KNS-KCNA) -- Nam Sung U, vice-chairman of the Central
Standing Committee of the General Association of Korean Residents in
Japan (Chongryon) released a statement on August 9 in support of the
statement of the DPRK government.
The statement expressed full support for the statement of the DPRK government, categorically rejecting the UN "sanctions resolution" cooked up by the U.S.-led hostile forces as a wanton violation and frontal challenge to the sovereignty of the DPRK.
The U.S.-led hostile forces should drop their worn-out hostile policy toward the DPRK and stop the provocations for a nuclear war at once, facing up the national power and dignity of socialist Korea put on the strategic position of a nuclear power and world-class military power of Juche, it said, adding:
The Japanese authorities crying out for scaling up pressure upon the DPRK while standing in the van of the U.S.-led racket of sanctions and pressure, failing to face up to the present situation where the world political structure has fundamentally changed with the new strategic position of the DPRK, and the south Korean authorities joining in the campaign for slapping sanctions against the compatriots in the north should refrain from their criminal acts against the history and the nation at once.
The statement expressed the will to turn Chongryon into a creditable and patriotic fortress remaining unfazed by any storm and stress and honorably contribute to the cause of realizing the independent reunification of the country, foiling the U.S.-led hostile forces' moves to isolate and stifle the DPRK. -0-
The statement expressed full support for the statement of the DPRK government, categorically rejecting the UN "sanctions resolution" cooked up by the U.S.-led hostile forces as a wanton violation and frontal challenge to the sovereignty of the DPRK.
The U.S.-led hostile forces should drop their worn-out hostile policy toward the DPRK and stop the provocations for a nuclear war at once, facing up the national power and dignity of socialist Korea put on the strategic position of a nuclear power and world-class military power of Juche, it said, adding:
The Japanese authorities crying out for scaling up pressure upon the DPRK while standing in the van of the U.S.-led racket of sanctions and pressure, failing to face up to the present situation where the world political structure has fundamentally changed with the new strategic position of the DPRK, and the south Korean authorities joining in the campaign for slapping sanctions against the compatriots in the north should refrain from their criminal acts against the history and the nation at once.
The statement expressed the will to turn Chongryon into a creditable and patriotic fortress remaining unfazed by any storm and stress and honorably contribute to the cause of realizing the independent reunification of the country, foiling the U.S.-led hostile forces' moves to isolate and stifle the DPRK. -0-
domenica 2 luglio 2017
Assegno postdatato emesso dal CTU Carlo Maranzano
Assegno emesso in data 28 maggio 2017:
Emesso da:
dott. Calogero Carlo Maranzano
Via Monfalcone, 53 - 70125 BARI
Carlo Maranzano è:
iscritto all'ordine dei dottori commercialisti ed esperti contabili della Circoscrizione del Tribunale di Bari n. 865A
iscritto al Registro dei Revisori Contabili presso il Ministero della Giustizia n. 34985
iscritto nell'Elenco dei Consulenti Tecnici del Giudice (CTU) del Tribunale di Bari n. 132/01
iscritto all'Istituto Nazionale Professionisti per la Gestione del Debito n. AA1315
Docente Esperto di Economia Aziendale per i Corsi PON promossi dalla Comunità Europera
Master in Marketing, conseguito a UCLA (University of California Los Angeles) 1971
Master in Organizzazione e Direzione Aziendale, Studio TESI Milano 1976
Presidente dell'Associazione Consumatori "La Convenienza - Bari
Revisore Contabile della Coop. Sociale di Servizi alle Famiglie e all'imprese "La Convenienza"
Socio dell'Associazione di Promozione Sociale "Il Mondo che Voglio"
Socio di IASSEM
Codice Fiscale: MRN CGR 40P03 G273D
mail PEC; postmaster@pec.laconvenienza.org
e-mail: maranzanocc@libero.it - carlomaranzano40@tiscali.it
Skype: carlomaranzano
tel. studio 080.5016848
cellulari: 3285847142 - 327626546
Corrispondenza;
dott. Calogero Carlo Maranzano
Via Monfalcone, 53 - 70125 BARI
NB: L'importo non è stato ancora saldato ad oggi...
Emesso da:
dott. Calogero Carlo Maranzano
Via Monfalcone, 53 - 70125 BARI
Carlo Maranzano è:
iscritto all'ordine dei dottori commercialisti ed esperti contabili della Circoscrizione del Tribunale di Bari n. 865A
iscritto al Registro dei Revisori Contabili presso il Ministero della Giustizia n. 34985
iscritto nell'Elenco dei Consulenti Tecnici del Giudice (CTU) del Tribunale di Bari n. 132/01
iscritto all'Istituto Nazionale Professionisti per la Gestione del Debito n. AA1315
Docente Esperto di Economia Aziendale per i Corsi PON promossi dalla Comunità Europera
Master in Marketing, conseguito a UCLA (University of California Los Angeles) 1971
Master in Organizzazione e Direzione Aziendale, Studio TESI Milano 1976
Presidente dell'Associazione Consumatori "La Convenienza - Bari
Revisore Contabile della Coop. Sociale di Servizi alle Famiglie e all'imprese "La Convenienza"
Socio dell'Associazione di Promozione Sociale "Il Mondo che Voglio"
Socio di IASSEM
Codice Fiscale: MRN CGR 40P03 G273D
mail PEC; postmaster@pec.laconvenienza.org
e-mail: maranzanocc@libero.it - carlomaranzano40@tiscali.it
Skype: carlomaranzano
tel. studio 080.5016848
cellulari: 3285847142 - 327626546
Corrispondenza;
Da: maranzanocc@libero.it
| 30 giugno 2017 |
Gentile dr. xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sono veramente mortificato per l'accaduto e provvedo domani mattina a fare il bonifico o la ricarica richiesta, oggi sono fuori Sede.
Nel frattempo La prego di inviarmi copia dell'assegno rifiutato dalla Sua banca con l'angolo troncato.
Ciò per essere certo che per cause imponderabili il pagamento non venga effettuato due volte.
Le aggiungo anche 5 euro per la raccomandata d'invio del titolo cartaceo, da inviare a:
Dr. Carlo Maranzano
Via Monfalcone, n. 53
70125 - BARI.
La ringrazio per tale invio che ovviamente farà dopo aver ricevuto il regolare pagamento.
Mi scusi ancora per il disguido, resto in attesa della mail con la fotocopia dell'assegno, della nota di rifiuto della banca e porgo i migliori saluti.
Sono veramente mortificato per l'accaduto e provvedo domani mattina a fare il bonifico o la ricarica richiesta, oggi sono fuori Sede.
Nel frattempo La prego di inviarmi copia dell'assegno rifiutato dalla Sua banca con l'angolo troncato.
Ciò per essere certo che per cause imponderabili il pagamento non venga effettuato due volte.
Le aggiungo anche 5 euro per la raccomandata d'invio del titolo cartaceo, da inviare a:
Dr. Carlo Maranzano
Via Monfalcone, n. 53
70125 - BARI.
La ringrazio per tale invio che ovviamente farà dopo aver ricevuto il regolare pagamento.
Mi scusi ancora per il disguido, resto in attesa della mail con la fotocopia dell'assegno, della nota di rifiuto della banca e porgo i migliori saluti.
dott. Calogero Carlo Maranzano
Via Monfalcone, 53 - 70125 BARI
NB: L'importo non è stato ancora saldato ad oggi...
| |||
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)
Italia: il paese più antidemocratico della UE
Italia: il paese più antidemocratico della UE Non è uno slogan da talk-show. È la conclusione che emerge se si misura la democrazia dove ...
-
I testimoni italiani del caso Jeffrey Epstein: Fonte: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/jeffrey-epstein-high-society-contacts.htm...
-
L'assalto della Russia e il nuovo mondo [Una vista del centro di Kiev. 25 febbraio 2022 - RIA Novosti, 1920, 26.02.2022. © REUTERS / Val...
-
Iniziata la causa globale per crimini contro l'umanità presentata ed accettata dalla Corte Superiore di Giustizia del Canada (vedi link ...



