THE "U.S. TREASURY or FEDERAL RESERVE or J.P. MORGAN" DO NOT OWN BONUS 3392 or 181 EITHER!
Posted By: watcher51445 [Send E-Mail]Date: Sunday, 5-Jun-2011 12:12:07
The Majority of WE the People do not know how to RESEARCH THIS ORGANIZED CRIME GROUPS ACTIVITIES.. THAT IS WHY I CONNECT THE DOTS FOR THEM.
All things being Equal, and EQUALLY CONSIDERED there needs to be a VERY SERIOUS, FULL, FORMAL, FORENSIC INVESTIGATION in to what was disclosed 2011/06/02 by Fed Lawyer Alvarez to RON PAUL U.S. Rep. Texas.
There is a THIRD LEDGER of Books holding SIX TRILLION, 500 BILLION DOLLARS "GOLD DEBT, GOLD SWAP-GOLD CONVERSION "PAYMENT OF THE $6.5 TRILLION DOLLAR "GOLD INTEREST" ACRUAL OF DEBT COLLATERALIZED, U.S. DEBT PAYMENT BY DEBT SWAP- DEBT CONVERSION. Accepted, rolled ONE YEAR AND ONE DAY, never applied TO THE "GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING OFFICE AS "PAID? http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/TrillionDollar.html
There is another SIX TRILLION FIVE HUNDRED BILLION "GOLD" DEBT-SWAP-DEBT CONVERSION FOR "GLOBAL HUMANITY" which is also believed to be in ROTHSCHILDS FEDERAL OPERATIVE AT "CLEAR STREAM" KEEPING TRACK OF "UBS SWITZERLAND." Both sets of instruments sent DHL see http://www.theantechamber.net/VkDocuments/UsDebtPaymt/UsDebtPaymt6.html
We, the TRUST; Paid the Ransom as the Corporate Creditor, to the Corporate Debtor, which was made in Good Faith. This constitutes: THE DEBT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS "PAID IN FULL."
DEPARTMENT OF THE JUSTICE and INTERPOL; IT IS EASY ENOUGH and Simple Enough to check! Backtrack through Treasurys "System"; "CUSIP ID" TDHTCOI:P/M/BONUS3392:181/1875:001:002/0521003:$6/5T:002COMPARE/CHECK THE DATES
of the May 21, 2003 Documents faxed to KAMARULZAMAN BIN ANNUAR, and the documents returned by K. MACK ROBINSON confirming "Bin Annuar's RECEIPT" documents dated JUNE 02, 2003 returned "JUNE 02, 2004" by K. Mack Robinson
http://www.theantechamber.net/VkDocuments/UsDebtPaymt/UsDebtPaymt19.html and
another 6.5 trillion for "global humanitarian' see:
http://www.theantechamber.net/VkDocuments/UsDebtPaymt/UsDebtPaymt19.html
and verification of SECOND CUSIP at
http://www.theantechamber.net/VkDocuments/UsDebtPaymt/UsDebtPaymt31.html
CUSIP TDHTCOI:P/M/BONUS3392:181/1875:001:002/0521003:$6/5T:003Did you know; This business of BODY POLITIC has become so corrupt, are "employed" in Federal Offices such as DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SEVICES, SOCIAL SECURITY "RECORDS AND BENEFITS, SSIDI (social security Disability Department, Military Records etc.?" These Dr.s Wives, Politicians Wives in your towns, cities, counties etc plus State and Federal Senators Wives, Congressmen's Wives, Congressmen & Senators, Presidents their wives and their "sons" have got into the MONEY MAKING of BODY POLITIC as explained in the FOLLOW THE MONEY articles posted at http://www.theantechambernet
and in particular http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/FollowTheMoney7.html which V.K. says is her last article (don't believe it, but she said it. She said she was just plain disgusted with this rampant Abuse of Powers).QUIT ALLOWING ORGANIZED CRIME TO DESTROY THE FIXED LAW OF ENGLAND AND THE united States of America i.e., THE LAW OF THE LAND and THEIR "ACTS OF CONGRESS" which THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ALLOWED, THEN THEY ALLOWED "MADALANE ALBRIGHT" TO BRING BACK IN TO THE U.S. of A. THE "LAW OF THE SEA".
When these alleged "international settlements" are stopped hanging in suspension by members of the US Congress who demand "their cut of the funding" DENOTES SERIOUS "CONFLICT OF INTEREST" AND "PROBABLE TREASON". READ MORE about this at
Read more: http://tdarkcabal.blogspot.com/2011/06/june-3-2011-white-hats-report-20.html
We the People are not aware of this WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION and it's pitfalls ..working with these PATROONS of the PILGRIM SOCIETY's ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, "COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS~WHITE HOUSE" steadily destroying the FARMS, MANUFACTURING, INDUSTRY of WE the People.. to bring in CHINA'S 'SUPER-HIGHWAY' (I-35 super-corridor) ..allowing "CHINA TO MONITOR U.S. PORTS"..
Its safe to say CLINTON'S KOFFEE KLATCH'S ..WITH THE CHINESE REPRESENTATIVE was a wee bit more than THE CONSTITUTION-Law Allows.. Equally for the selling off of American Infrastructure by President Bush back in 1992..see:
http://www.theantechamber.net/UsHistDoc/Exord12803/Exord12803Index.html .Bye the way.. get familiar with ODIOUS DEBTS ..because these busters are going to try to slam these BOGUS DEBTS down our throats and We the People are HOLD HARMLESS & NOT RESPONSIBLE for these Debts..see:
http://theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/BogusUsDebt.htm ..Now read the PROJECT for the Exposure of Hidden Institutions-Pilgrims Society- READ MORE: http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/WhoTheTheysAre.htm
NO NATION, NO LIFE IS SAFE UNTIL THIS IS INVESTIGATED "PROPERLY"
Until the "cause" or the "beginning" of this crap is dug into and investigated properly AND THE PERP.S PROSECUTED; ITS ALL PURE 'BULL'.. WON'T GO ANYWHERE BUT 'GOSSIP PAGES'..
Subject: GIGA SCANDAL DOCS
http://www.tomflocco.com/Docs/Gs/GigaScandal.htm(Note* Individual access numbers are assigned to an individualfs Name when an account number has multi access.)
V.K. Durham
V.K. Durham, CEO
Durham Intl. Ltd; Trust, Tias 12087
Durham Trust, Duly Constituted "Creditor" of U.S.A. and ALL Debtor NationsREAD THE FOLLOWING and it is clearly EVIDENT the U.S. TREASURY and FEDERAL RESERVE BANKING need an "OUTSIDE AUDIT" BY THE 10Th AMENDMENT GOVERNMENTS "GRAND JURY" which not only consists of VICTIM NATIONS of this ORGANIZED POLITICAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION who here-to-fore HAVE, LIKE THE FOX'S.. BEEN GUARDING THE "HEN-HOUSE"
** Sorry this is not professionally structured, but! You are assured it will be structured. A family member was just had an accident.]
[VKD]
============================Quoting the Fedfs general counsel declare that the Federal Reserve owns no gold. THE FEDERAL RESERVE DOES NOT OWN ANY GOLD AT ALL! http://goldnews.com/2011/06/02/fed-lawyer-alvarez-the-federal-reserve-does-not-own-any-gold-at-all/
Fed Lawyer Alvarez: gThe Federal Reserve Does NOT Own Any Gold at Allh Thats right. The Fed owns NO gold. Zero, zip, ziltch.
So what exactly are the gold certificates the Fed holds? For one, the Fedfs gold certificates are unlike previous gold certificate issues, and are not publicly trade-able. They are also not direct claims to gold, but rather reflect claims only to US issued currency or coin held by the Treasury. The Fed can take claim to this currency on demand, and their certificates are an accounted for liability of the Treasury as listed in Note 19. Treasuryfs gOther Liabilitiesh. In addition, if the Treasury is unable to satisfy a demand by the Fed for the funds, the Fed is able to gain access to the gold, since the gold stands as collateral for the gold certificates issued by the Treasury. This fact is taken from this statement in Note 2, from the Treasuryfs balance sheet: Note 2. Cash and Other Monetary Assetshttp://www.fms.treas.gov/finrep/note_finstmts/fr_notes_fin_stmts_note2.html
Given that the Fed has an indirect claim to the Treasuryfs gold, it is questionable what line of reasoning the Fedfs general counsel was using when stating so broadly that the Fed has gno interest in the gold that is owned by the treasuryh.
For those of you who did not watch yesterdayfs monetary policy hearing in the house of representatives, you most likely missed this bombshell exchange between Federal Reserve lawyer Scott Alvarez and committee chairman Dr. Ron Paul. My jaw literally dropped when I heard the Fedfs general counsel declare that the Federal Reserve owns no gold. After 1934, Alvarez explains that the Fed handed its gold over to the Treasury in exchange for gold certificates. When pressed further, Alvarez noted that the gold certificates do not represent any interest whatsoever in the gold itself. He explained the gold certificate listings on the Fed balance sheet, not as a claim to gold, but at most a claim to dollars from the Treasury. See the quotes here (and watch the videos at the bottom of the post):
Scott Alvarez: gThe Federal Reserve does not own any gold at allc we have not owned gold since 1934, um, so we have not engaged in any gold swap. Before 1934 the Federal Reserve did, we did own gold. We turned that over by law to the Treasury and received in return for that gold certificates.h
Ron Paul: gcYou have the securities for essentially all the gold?h
============================================
V.K. Durham, CEO Durham Intl. Ltd; Holding Trust, Tias 12087 (1876)
Ron Paul and the Secretary of the US Treasury seemingly continue to ignore the "Depository Trust Co. 55 Water Street, New York, New York U.S.A. the holder for Rothschild Banking United Kingdom and United States of Americas' 'holder of all Title Deeds and Mortgages' did the week of December 20t, 2002 ship all deeds, mortgages and title documents held securely in the Depository Trust Co. Owners J.P. Morgan and Rothschild Banking etals AFTER DURHAM TRUST MADE A DEMAND OF PAYMENT which are believed to be included in that mentioned in Note 19. Other Liabilities which everyone needs to read.
http://www.fms.treas.gov/finrep/note_finstmts/fr_notes_fin_stmts_note19.html
2010 Financial Report of the United States Government
===================================INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING TO KNOW WHAT IS BEING "ACCOUNTED FOR ON ONE HAND" WITH THE OTHER "TWO HANDS" DIPPING IN THE "TILL"
Notes to the Financial Statements
Note 19. Other Liabilities
Other Liabilities as of September 30 (In billions of dollars) 2010 2009
Unearned revenue and assets held for others:
DOE's unearned fees for nuclear waste disposal and other unearned revenue 74.2 39.8
Assets held on behalf of others 64.9 56.6
Subtotal 139.1 96.4
Employee-related liabilities:
Accrued Federal employees wages and benefits 42.7 38.9
Selected DOE contractors' and D.C. employees' pension benefits 50.2 41.8
Subtotal 92.9 80.7
International monetary liabilities and gold certificates
Exchange Stabilization 60.1 61.2
Gold Certificates (Note 2) 11.0 11.0
Subtotal 71.1 72.2
Subsidies and grants:
Farm and other subsidies 13.2 13.9
Grant payments due to State and local governments and others 18.1 16.5
Subtotal 31.3 30.4
Miscellaneous liabilities:
Legal and other contingencies 31.4 26.1
Bonneville Power Administration non-Federal power projects
and capital lease liabilities, and disposal liabilities 9.4 10.2
Other miscellaneous 41.3 38.1
Subtotal 82.1 74.4
Total other liabilities 416.5 354.1http://www.fms.treas.gov/finrep/note_finstmts/fr_notes_fin_stmts_note19.html
=======================================================THE KEY TO ALL OF THIS ONCE AGAIN GOES BACK TO "FDR'S MARCH 9, 1933 AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT, EMERGENCY WAR POWERS ACT and ENABLEING ACT.
This was posted yesterday June 3rd, 2011:
Big GAMES ARE BEING PLAYED as DOPPLEGANGER (look alike) "US" CORPORATE Congressmen/women and Senators want a "cut of the action" which under the REAL U.S. CONSTITUTIONALLY AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT which was "DISMISSED" in Sine Die by F.D.R. Executive Order Enableing BankAct/Emergency War Powers Act of March 9, 1933 following Adolph Hitler's March 5, 1933.Its been a lot of years go by and a lot of water under the bridge, too many pre-mature deaths, too many families destroyed, too many farms lost, too many homes lost, too many Civil Liberties and Constitutional Rights lost, too much "Subversion of the Law of the Land (Constitutional Law) since this CONTRA mess began.
When Roosevelt convinced Congress to pass the Agriculture Re-Adjustment Act aka The Emergency War Powers Act in 1933..there was an exclusion of "American Citizens".. The Constitution forbid 'aggressive acts' against We, the People.
Unfortunately, there are those in power in high level offices of Public Trust here in the U.S. of A. who have no idea what the "Constitutional Can Do's" and "Constitutional Can Not Do's" are. Therefore, We, the People of the Xth Amendment Government must scrutinize very carefully that which our IXth (9th) Amendment Representatives refuse to address in our behalf.
The U.S. of A. has been under assault since 1945 and the final signatures of agreeing nations, finalized by 145 Nations in Haiti in 1947. Since the BRETON WOODS AGREEMENT-GATT of that time by those attempting to Subvert the Law (Constitution) and destroy her infra-structure.
Before the "Ink" was dry on the EUROPEAN CONFLICT OF WWII.. the Keysnians/Rothschilds had caused to be drafted THE BRETON WOODS AGREEMENT-IMF (International Monetary Fund) GATT (General Agreements on Trades and Tariffs) whereas The United States would once again have the U.S. Dept. of the Treasury Trust of We the People be put in the position of having the United Kingdoms "Rothschild Federal Reserve Banking System messing around with the SOUND U.S. DOLLAR supporting and controling THE WORLD BANK.
Look up what CONTRA means. You are going to be surprised that it happened right here in the U.S. of A. in 1953--54 during Dwight D. Eisenhowerfs Administration. Mr. Eisenhower decided to do a few things that were against THE MONROE DOCTRINE involving "Freedom Fighters" or Sandinistas overthrowing governments in Latin America. Eisenhower was a CFR member. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=206148
Involvemt of the CFR or COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS; see: PUBLIC NOTICE where they "agree not to interfere" with those who "authorized" this "SUBVERSIVE-UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITY" at to cover up http://www.theantechamber.net/VkDocuments/DocGroupG/Gpage4.html which was the beginning of the Bush & Clinton structuring of the GLOBAL BANKING, FINANCING AND ECONOMIC "HOSTAGE TAKING" http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/VkPublicNotice.html
THE CONTRA FALL-OUT - & COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS; THE NOW TIME (6)
http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/ContraAffairsFallOut6.htmWhen Roosevelt convinced Congress to pass the Agriculture Re-Adjustment Act aka The Emergency War Powers Act in 1933..there was an exclusion of "American Citizens".. The Constitution forbid 'aggressive acts' against We, the People.
Unfortunately, there are those in power in high level offices of Public Trust here in the U.S. of A. who have no idea what the "Constitutional Can Do's" and "Constitutional Can Not Do's" are. Therefore, We, the People of the Xth Amendment Government must scrutinize very carefully that which our IXth (9th) Amendment Representatives refuse to address in our behalf.
Fed Lawyer Alvarez: gThe Federal Reserve Does NOT Own Any Gold at Allh
[ Read this and open the links contained inside
http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/ContraAffairsFallOut5.htm ]Thats right. The Fed owns NO gold. Zero, zip, ziltch.
For those of you who did not watch yesterdayfs monetary policy hearing in the house of representatives, you most likely missed this bombshell exchange between Federal Reserve lawyer Scott Alvarez and committee chairman Dr. Ron Paul. My jaw literally dropped when I heard the Fedfs general counsel declare that the Federal Reserve owns no gold. After 1934, Alvarez explains that the Fed handed its gold over to the Treasury in exchange for gold certificates. When pressed further, Alvarez noted that the gold certificates do not represent any interest whatsoever in the gold itself. He explained the gold certificate listings on the Fed balance sheet, not as a claim to gold, but at most a claim to dollars from the Treasury. See the quotes here (and watch the videos at the bottom of the post):
Scott Alvarez: gThe Federal Reserve does not own any gold at allc we have not owned gold since 1934, um, so we have not engaged in any gold swap. Before 1934 the Federal Reserve did, we did own gold. We turned that over by law to the Treasury and received in return for that gold certificates.h
Ron Paul: gcYou have the securities for essentially all the gold?h
Scott Alvarez: gNo. No we have no interest in the gold that is owned by the Treasury. We have simply an accounting document that is called gold certificates that represents the value at a statutory rate that we gave to the Treasury in 1934
This issue is even more complicated than may appear and after doing some research we seem to have settled some of the quirks in this odd Treasury-Fed scheme. Bare with us when reading through this.
What appears to have happened under the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 [ http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanking/Money/LegHistory/48Stat337-344.pdf ] is the Treasury seized the Fedfs gold, taking full ownership and claim to its proceeds. The Treasury as an aside transferred a sum of special 1934 series gold certificates to the Fed amounting to the statutory value of gold ($20.67 per ounce) times the quantity of gold transfered from the Fed to the Treasury. The official gold price was later revalued to $35 an ounce, an effective devaluation of the currency, but the quantity of gold certificates issued to the Fed was not amended to reflect revaluation until the passing of the Par Value Modification Act of 1972. Under this act, gold was revalued again, this time to $38 an oz, and the Fedfs gold certificate account was credited upwards by $822 million worth of certificates to reflect the change in the gold price from $35 to $38. The gold was revalued one last time in 1973 to $42.22 and again the Federal Reserve was credited with more gold certificates, $1.157 billion to be exact, to account for this. After everything, the Federal Reserve was left with $11.16 billion dollars worth of gold certificates.
So what exactly are the gold certificates the Fed holds? For one, the Fedfs gold certificates are unlike previous gold certificate issues, and are not publicly trade-able. They are also not direct claims to gold, but rather reflect claims only to US issued currency or coin held by the Treasury. The Fed can take claim to this currency on demand, and their certificates are an accounted for liability of the Treasury as listed in Note 19. Treasuryfs gOther Liabilitiesh. In addition, if the Treasury is unable to satisfy a demand by the Fed for the funds, the Fed is able to gain access to the gold, since the gold stands as collateral for the gold certificates issued by the Treasury. This fact is taken from this statement in Note 2, from the Treasuryfs balance sheet:
gGold totaling $11.1 billion as of September 30, 2010, and 2009, was pledged as collateral for gold certificates issued and authorized to the FRBs by the Secretary of the Treasury.g
Given that the Fed has an indirect claim to the Treasuryfs gold, it is questionable what line of reasoning the Fedfs general counsel was using when stating so broadly that the Fed has gno interest in the gold that is owned by the treasuryh.
http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanking/Money/LegHistory/48Stat337-344.pdf
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento